Tag: Corruption
Alleged Heroin Smuggler And The Inspiration For The TV Show ‘Orange Is The New Black’ Elected Senator In Nigeria
According to the Associated Press, a man indicted in America for allegedly smuggling heroin, in a court case that was the basis for the TV hit Orange Is The New Black, has been elected a senator in Nigeria.
Buruji Kashamu was little known before he returned home in 2003 from Britain despite a US extradition order to become a major financier of President Goodluck Jonathan’s party.
Election results identify Kashamu as a senator-elect in south-west Ogun state. Opponents are challenging his victory in court, saying ballots were rigged.
Kashamu, 56, hung up the phone twice when the Associated Press called for comment about the drug case. Kashamu has said he is “a clean businessman” and that the 1998 indictment by a grand jury in the Northern District of Illinois for conspiracy to import and distribute heroin in the United States is a case of mistaken identity. He has said Chicago prosecutors really want the dead brother he closely resembles.
A British court refused a US extradition request in 2003 over uncertainty about Kashamu’s identity. Chicago Judge Richard Posner thought otherwise when he refused a motion to dismiss Kashamu’s case last year.
A dozen people were long ago tried and jailed in the case, including American Piper Kerman, whose memoir about her jail time became the Netflix hit Orange Is The New Black. Kerman’s book never identified Kashamu by name, but there is a west African drug kingpin whom she calls “Alhaji”, meaning one who has completed the haj or pilgrimage to Mecca.
A Nigerian federal court last year ordered Kashamu’s extradition, an order upheld by an appeals court. But Nigeria’s government has not extradited him.
That failure caused Olusegun Obasanjo, a former president, to warn that “drug barons … will buy candidates, parties and eventually buy power or be in power themselves”.
Jonathan’s perceived protection of Kashamu was a factor that led Obasanjo to defect from the ruling party before recent elections to the opposition that won most votes in Ogun, the home state of Kashamu and Obasanjo.
Kashamu is suing Obasanjo for libel for stating that Kashamu is a fugitive from US justice. He had won a court order halting publication of Obasanjo’s autobiography but a judge this week rescinded it, saying Kashamu had misled the court. Obasanjo’s lawyer argued that the truth cannot be libel.
President-elect Muhammadu Buhari, a former military dictator who had people jailed for littering in the 1980s, has promised to fight corruption. That has many politicians fearful in a country where corruption is endemic.
FBI Admits Flawed Forensic Test Results May Have Led To Hundreds Of Wrongful Criminal Convictions
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) admits that hundreds of flawed or “inaccurate” forensic testing results were submitted as evidence in hundreds of criminal trials over the last 30 years.
This means that there could be as many as hundreds of innocent convicted people in prison for crimes that they did not commit, dating as far back as the 1980s.
Unfortunately, among the possible wrongfully convicted were 32 people who received the death penalty; of which 14 of those people have been executed, based on forensic testing results submitted during trial.
The US Justice Department does acknowledge fault and said (via statement) that they and the FBI are “committed to ensuring that affected defendants are notified of past errors and that justice is done in every instance.”
What does this mean for the hundreds of people who may have been wrongfully convicted?
Wrongful incarceration is not only an injustice to the innocent, but also to the victim(s) as well as the community collectively. Incarcerating the wrong person for a crime certainly doesn’t make the neighborhood any safer and the taxpayers foot the bill.
R&B singer and philanthropist John Legend recently launched “FREE AMERICA”, a nationwide campaign established in efforts to raise awareness about America’s incarceration problem and help find solutions to end mass incarceration throughout the U.S.
Follow Let’s Free America for more information.
The FBI has admitted large scale failings in the evidence some of its forensic experts gave in hundreds of criminal trials in the 1980s and 1990s.
Flawed evidence was given by 26 forensic examiners in the agency’s microscopic hair comparison unit which affected 268 trials, the Washington Post reported.
In more than 95 per cent of the cases forensic matches were overstated in favour of prosecution arguments, the newspaper said.
The cases included 32 in which defendants received the death penalty, and 14 of those have since been executed or died in prison.
The Washington Post said the figures had been established by the National Association of Criminal Defence Lawyers and the Innocence Project.
Defendants involved in the cases are in 46 states and are being notified to consider if there are grounds for appeal.
An investigation began in 2012 after the Washington Post reported that flawed forensic matches of hair may have led to wrongful convictions.
In a statement the FBI and US Justice Department said they were “committed to ensuring that affected defendants are notified of past errors and that justice is done in every instance.
“The department and the FBI are also committed to ensuring the accuracy of future hair analysis, as well as the application of all disciplines of forensic science.”
The Pen Hustle With Brandy Cavalli 
You must be logged in to post a comment.